Public
Hearings & Regular Meeting
Wednesday,
August 9, 2006
7:00 p.m.
Members Present: Larry
Cuddire, Chairman (LC), Robert Straubel, Vice Chairman (RS), Lisa Lane (LL),
Dave Holscher (DH) and Don Egan (DE)
Also Present: Assistant Planner,
Leah Hill (LH) and Secretary, Pat Banfield
Meeting Opened at 7:00 p.m.
1.
New Business - Building Permits /Plans
a.
Building Permit – Amin Nabhan,
b. ANR – Maria
& Jose Soares,
LL feels both lot (sizes) should be more equitable
DE questions getting a legal opinion from town counsel.
RS states that this subdivision
is not bound by zoning by-law, due to pre-existing of both dwellings before
laws were in effect. Briefly, according
to ML 81L, the applicant is allowed to subdivide anyway they choose.
RS motions that we endorse ANR and sign plans.
DE Seconds
Vote on motion 4 – 1 (LL opposed)
c.
ANR – Wayne Capolupo,
RS motions to allow applicant to withdraw ANR
DH Seconds
Vote on motion 5 – 0 motion passes
2.
Correspondence
LL Motion to accept and sign Planning Board Minutes from July 26, 2006
RS Seconds
Vote on motion 5 – 0 motion passes
3.
7:30 PM Public Hearings
a.
Cont. SPR – Wave Properties,
Initially,
DE motioned to deny SP approval
based on the incomplete submission of the project.
LL Second (withdrawn)
DE amended motion to accept a signed letter for extension for SPR for
RS Seconds
Vote on motion 4 – 0 (DH abstained)
4.
Other Business:
a.
Request for Certificate of Completion – Harold Nabhan, 5 O’clock Club project – James
O’Leary, Atty., Dale Gienapp, Architects and T. Cook of SPS were present to
address the boards concerns.
The board’s two concerns are
(1) the egress off of the deck and (2) exposed pilings. Mr. Nabhan is proceeding with the work that
is unfinished at the 5 O’clock Club. He
would like to complete all the projects.
Difficulty in scheduling tradesmen to come out to the property. Mr. Gienapp will address the life safety study
and the swing of the doors to the outside deck and the panic bar location has
to be changed. One of the incomplete
items is the 2nd railing, which has been completed this week. Also, adding an additional exterior door to
the north side of the club and cleaning up the store front in the vacant part
of the building.
DE and LL both revisited the issue of adding exterior stairs
from the deck directly to the beach below.
Architect, Dale Gienapp stated that patrons could safely exit the deck
via the north and south exits that lead to the club’s interior. Also, Mr. Gienapp stated that relocation of
crash bar doors to open into building from deck will be addressed.
RS questioned how would people get off the deck if they could not go
through the building? Board members wanted to see some sort of emergency egress
directly from the deck.
The
Planning Board noted that Mr. Nabhan has failed to comply with the formal “life
safety study” and the removal of the exposed pilings. According to the towns zoning bylaws, the
planning board has the authority to make conditions that require off-site
improvements for public safety reasons; therefore, Mr. Nabhan is still
responsible for the removal of the pilings, even though they are not on his
land. Mr. Gienapp states that the Town
would need to request state permits for the removal of the pilings.
Comment
from public-Mary Cuddire questions if there was some sort of ladder that could
be utilized on the deck that could be used in case of a fire. According to Mr. Gienapp, this would not be
considered a legal means of egress.
Comment
from public-Angel Chiaramida questions “Life Safety Study” and “Exit designed”
off the deck. Mr. Cook of SPS stated the
design was to code. Also, Angel
questioned if the Salisbury Fire Department equipment would be able to access
people on the deck in case of emergency?
Mr.
Gienapp stated that the doors entering onto the deck were not installed as
shown on the drawing presented with the Chapter 34 Code Review that his firm
prepared for Mr. Nabhan. Specifically,
because the building inspector specified and approved this configuration, the
doors open outward onto the deck rather than inward toward the building. Mr. Nabhan wants to achieve the level of
safety for this deck as defined in the Chapter 34 Code Review. Therefore, the doors will be changed and
reinstalled to swing in towards the restaurant as that is the means of egress.
LC questions if the applicant could be ready and have all issues completed
by the next meeting on August 23rd. Applicant’s Atty. O’Leary could not ensure
that the doors would be completed by that date.
The
Planning Board will continue discussion on the approval of the Certificate of
Compliance for the 5 O’Clock property at the next Planning Board meeting on
August 23, 2006.
5.
Adjournment:
DE motions to adjourn meeting at 8:45
p.m.
RS Seconds
Vote on motion 5 – 0 motion passes
Meeting is adjourned
Minutes Approved by: Date: