Salisbury
Charter Review Committee
Minutes of
Regular Meeting & Public Hearing
Monday,
August 10, 2009
Members
Present: Bob Carroll (BC); Mike Gilbert
(MG); Robert Straubel (RS); Jim Dondero (JD); Mary Cuddire (MC); Ed Hunt (EH)
Member(s)
Absent: Harold Congdon
Visitors: Jerry Klima, Selectman; Ron Ray, Moderator; Larry
Cuddire; Henry Richenburg, Selectman; Fred Knowles, Selectman
Chairperson Opens Regular Meeting at 7:05 p.m.
- Old Business
- BC
introduces the members of the Charter Review Committee and explains its
purpose and procedures to the visiting audience.
- BC opens
the floor for discussion of proposed changes to § 7-9 (g) of Salisbury
Town Charter. MG moves to
recommend changing previously amended § 7-9 (g) to read as follows: “Composition
of Multiple Member Bodies – All multiple member bodies, when established,
shall be composed of voters in the Town of Salisbury and have an odd
number of members. Whenever the terms of office of a multiple member
body extend for more than one
year, such terms of office shall be so arranged that as nearly an equal
number of terms as is possible will expire each year. Town employees
shall not serve on multi-member bodies that provide policies or guidance
to the employee's Town agency.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, town employees and non-voters may
serve on the Board of Assessors, Ad Hoc committees, and as ex officio
(non-voting) members of multimember bodies.” – JD seconds.
- Discussion of motion:
i. MC believes that having the town
assessors serve on the Board of Assessors is a conflict and should not be
allowed as a special exception in the article under consideration.
ii. EH suggests that the assessors
could be considered ex officio members
of the Board of Assessors allowing them to give advice but not vote.
iii. MG discusses the reasons why he
believes the proposed wording is the correct method of handling employees on
town boards and reviews the contents of the town manager’s August 3, 2009 memo
on the subject.
- Vote to approve motion: 4 (MG,
BC, RS, JD) – 2 (MC, EH) – motion passes.
- Approval of August 4, 2009
Meeting Minutes
- MG moves to
amend the minutes by changing the citation “§7 (a) (g)” in paragraph 3.b
to “§ 7-9 (g)” – RS seconds – vote in favor 6-0 (unanimous)
- MG moves to approve the amended
minutes – RS seconds – vote in favor 6-0 (unanimous).
- Public Presentation of Charter
Committee Recommended Changes
- BC presents
a listing of the recommended changes that the Committee has produced so
far.
- BC asks
for comments on the changes by Committee members. There are none.
- BC asks
for comments from the visiting public.
- Public Comments
- Fred Knowles
suggests that the proposed change in § 7-9 (g) requiring all members of
multi-member bodies to be voters of the Town of Salisbury would eliminate
non-voters who have business in the town and therefore have a vested
interest in town government. Mr.
Knowles questions whether or not this is advisable. BC responds that this change was
the consensus of the Committee based on the Committee’s own beliefs and
comments from other members of the community.
- Jerry Klima
believes that the use of the term ex
officio is incorrect in § 7-9 (g) because its true meaning is someone
who is member of a committee by virtue of another office they hold and
not, as it appears to be intended, meaning someone who is a non-voting board
member. BC suggests that
the Committee will take this question up at its next meeting.
- Jerry Klima comments
that the recommended change in § 2-8
requiring annual written notice to all members of multi-member bodies of
the requirements of § 2-8 is overly burdensome in time and expense. MG explains the Committee’s
position that this requirement is needed to improve the attendance of
multi-member body members at town meetings, and e-mail will satisfy the
written requirement with minimal expense.
- Larry Cuddire says
that he believes that having the town assessors serve on the Board of
Assessors is not proper and should not be allowed as a special exception
in §7-9 (g). JD suggests
that, because this is a controversial issue for many people, it should be
brought up on the floor of the town meeting for further discussion and
possible amendment to the Committee’s recommendation.
- BC discusses
how the town meeting vote will be held, and that it will be possible to
amend the Committee’s recommendations, but the warrant article will
encompass all of the changes at once.
BC, seeing no further comments from the visiting public,
closes the public hearing.
- Adjournment
- BC suggests
that the next meeting should be held on September 1, 2009. the Committee agrees.
- The
Committee votes by acclimation to adjourn at approximately 8:00 PM.
Minutes Approved By:_____________________________ Date:___________